In a technological world of endless possibilities, this proves that at some point there needs to be a line drawn with what can and cannot be instantaneously accessed by the public. Reading this article got my wheels turning, and I really started to think about different scenarios.
If a rule like this appeared as a guideline for an American based competition, would people argue that the rule is against the athletes' and coaches' First Amendment Rights?
My opinion is... yes. If someone were to get in trouble for breaking "Rule 49," they could take it to court arguing that it is abridging their rights to freedom of speech / press, and would most likely win.
Readers, what are your thoughts?
No comments:
Post a Comment